HONG KONGEven Karl Marx might have managed a wry smile. On Sunday the contradictions
of Chinese socialism were on full display. Shanghai celebrated in typically
flamboyant fashion the debut of Formula One motor racing in China. "And the
winner is ... Shanghai" proclaimed this newspaper. Other foreign news media
gushed more extravagantly and national ones exuded pride in Chinese
achievements. Meanwhile Beijing was unveiling a weighty document entitled
"Decision of Enhancing the Party's Ability to Govern," the outcome of the recent
plenum of the Central Committee of the Communist Party. The message: Tighten the
party's faltering grip.
.
It is unfair to brand Shanghai as a
Potemkin village. Its modernity stretches out well into neighboring cities such
as Nanjing and Suzhou, the heartland of China's growth. Its dynamism, driven by
local, Taiwanese and foreign talent, is unmistakable. But while staging a grand
prix might enthuse China's new legions of car fanatics and impress swarms of
rubbernecking foreign bankers, the expenditure of huge sums of public money on
such an elite and environmentally unfriendly sport said much about the party's
present condition.
.
As well as the most shiny example of
China's new “socialist” construction, Shanghai is also an example of vast waste
of public funds and the locus of the most extensive graft. It is the antithesis
of what the document sets as the goals of the party: eliminating corruption and
paying more attention to the rural areas, where 60 percent of China's population
still live.
.
Shanghai's gleaming high-rise offices,
subways, highways and adventurous public buildings are a source of national
pride for the new elite and have awakened foreign investors to the pace of
change in China. But at what cost? Will a later generation look back on these
constructions as they now do on Stalin's efforts to portray Moscow's modernity
with symbolic skyscrapers and marble subway stations? Does Shanghai need a grand
prix track and an ultraexpensive, energy-devouring maglev railway for anything
other than a big Communist Party show?
.
If you want to know why infrastructure is
so deficient in the rest of China, why rural incomes have lagged, why rural
education and health services have declined, come to Shanghai and see where
public money has gone. Want to know why China's banking system is so riddled
with nonperforming loans? Come to Shanghai and see the office palaces built by
state enterprises with money from the state banks and tax breaks from the
central government. Want to know the biggest sources of the corruption that so
distresses the party? Come look at the processes of real estate development in
Shanghai. Want to know why the party is unable to contain abuses? Look at how
those with political power seek to maintain state control while glorifying
private acquisition of wealth. So much for the party's demand to resist
"hedonism."
.
Want to know why income distribution in
China is now worse than almost anywhere in the developing world? Look at how
Shanghai has made itself into a kind of Monaco, with citizenship only for
newcomers with heaps of cash or a doctorate in information technology. So much
for the "socialist harmony" in which people contribute according their
abilities, as enjoined by the party document.
.
Want to know about cultural development
in China? Try to work out where the cultural development will come from to fill
Shanghai's opera house and art gallery when the plenum calls for the party to
strengthen its effort to "correctly guide public opinion" and instill such
"fundamental ethics" as patriotism.
.
Want to know why high-level corruption in
Shanghai, as elsewhere, though much bemoaned, is seldom exposed? Listen to the
party's demand that controls on the news media be tightened - in other words,
that nothing be written that brings senior party men into disrepute, whatever
their behavior.
.
Like much of urban China, Shanghai is
alive with capitalist endeavor and individual entrepreneurship. But as a city it
seems unwilling to face up to how much it owes both to the central government
and its own exclusivist city-state policies, which would be unthinkable in freer
countries, like India or Indonesia.
.
Left to its own devices, Shanghai could
hardly fail to prosper, given its internationalist attitudes and its central
position on the coast. But for now, Shanghai is the contradiction of Chinese
socialism writ large.
.
Individual enterprise to get rich, by any
available means, is acceptable. But only so long as the state - guided by the
party and its elite - is in control, and state enterprise "plays the dominant
role" and patriotism is the dominant ideology.