Meanwhile: The
mysterious demise of a grand ocean liner By Philip Bowring (IHT) Wednesday, December 31, 2003
In her time the Queen Elizabeth, at 83,000 tons, was also the largest
passenger vessel afloat and the pride of the Cunard Line. Launched in
1938, she did wartime service before becoming empress of the Atlantic
crossing. Her death in Hong Kong harbor in 1972 was no accident.
The ship, by then known as the Seawise University, caught fire in
several places at once on Jan. 7, burned furiously and capsized and sank
the following day. Who killed the queen? The murderers have never been
identified, let alone brought to trial.
One person who must remember that day vividly is Hong Kong's chief
executive, Tung Chee-hwa. Then a young executive of Island Navigation, the
shipping line owned by his father C.Y. Tung, he was having lunch on board
the ship when the fires started.
The Queen Elizabeth, retired by Cunard in 1968, was bought by C.Y. Tung
in 1970 and renamed the Seawise University - a pun on the owner's name and
an indicator of its intended new use as a floating university. It had
nearly completed a refit in Hong Kong when the arsonists struck.
A court of inquiry in Hong Kong concluded that several fires were set
simultaneously using highly inflammable substances. It was a "deliberate
act by persons or persons unknown." Otherwise, the court of inquiry found,
no one was especially to blame for the disaster which, miraculously,
claimed no lives but was a huge insurance loss. The police, it was
revealed, received a tip-off about an alleged mastermind but it was
anonymous and was disregarded.
After the court of inquiry, the case was handed to the criminal
investigation department of the Hong Kong police. Thirty years later the
public is still waiting to hear what they have found. There have been no
arrests, no charges laid and there has been an almost total absence of
follow-up discussion or press speculation. Historians and crime writers
might hope that government archives would hold some clues. But if they do,
they are still held too tightly to help.
Britain and Hong Kong both have rules under which, with a few
exceptions, government records become available to the public after 30
years. With 30 years having elapsed, surely a search of the public records
offices in London and Hong Kong would reveal some clues? I have searched,
but in both locations there is scant documentation. Most of it was either
published at the time or concerns technical details about salvage
operations. It includes interviews with those on board at the time, every
one of whom professed ignorance of how the fires could have started. But
otherwise the trail leads nowhere.
At the time the most common speculation was that the fires had been set
by Communists for political reasons, to spite C.Y. Tung who was closely
identified with the nationalist government on Taiwan. Island Navigation
denied that there was a political motive, but it remains possible. In
which case, is it too late for Tung Chee-hwa to find out from Communists
friends in Beijing? Or perhaps the British were involved in a cover-up.
Public exposure of Communist involvement would have obstructed delicate
efforts then under way to improve relations with Beijing.
If the motive was not political, was a business dispute behind the
arson? If so, the late C.Y. Tung would surely have had a good idea who was
behind it. Another rumor at the time related to insurance cover. As early
as February 1971, the Far Eastern Economic Review had asked, concerning
the ship: "Can even C.Y. Tung afford to keep it afloat?"
Soon after the ship's arrival in Hong Kong waters in mid-1971, the
government's Marine Department wrote a critical analysis of its condition
and even developed a contingency plan for tackling a major fire should one
break out during the vessel's refit. But such preparations were no match
for a well-planned arson.
The ship died, the mystery lives. May the Queen Mary 2 have a long life
and a more dignified end than her aunt. |
Subscriptions E-mail Alerts | About the IHT : Privacy & Cookies : Contact the IHT |